Lost "The Lighthouse"
This was a pretty cool episode, leading to hopefully a super cool showdown episode next week. This episode was mostly about Jack being groomed by Jacob (via Hugo) to do whatever it is he needs him to do. Become Jacob? Do whatever Locke was supposed to do? Be the candidate to defend the island? Meanwhile, in never never land, or the alternative reality Jack has a kid. Huh- what? A teenage kid at that. When did that happen? And how did the plane not crashing cause him to have a son? That whole thing is still so unclear. Also unclear why blowing up the hatch caused the island to never exist. I guess we'll get more on that plotline later.
PopTards Podcast Eppy 18 - Clash of the Titans (Remake AND Original!)
Previous Episode:17 - Amazing Spider-Man: THE GAUNTLET!
Friday, February 26, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, February 19, 2010
Movie Review by Pete Tutton: Street Fighter
Let’s be honest. Street Fighter II could never have been made into a good movie. I don’t care if Martin Scorsese and Steven Speilberg had a three way with Peter Jackson while James Cameron gently touched himself in the corner, the resulting love child could not make compelling cinema out of this video game title.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Episode 11 is up! Movie Review: The Wolfman
Spoiler Alert!!! So go see it and then come back and torture your ear drums.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Weekly LOST Discussion! by Jess "The Hoss" Tutton
Episode 4: The Substitute
Things are becoming clearer, aren't they? As we thought previously, Jacob has been selecting people to bring to the island. This is why he touched them. And why the Man in Black knew how people keep ending up on the island. The Man in Black states that Jacob wants them there as replacements. However, it is unknown if everything he states is true. It was cool to see the last names of our castaways behind the famous "numbers." It is also interesting to see how early on Jacob chose some of our castaways.
Which brings me to my new theory. Perhaps the parallel universe we are seeing, sans plane crash is the world that would exist if Jacob had not chosen to bring certain people to the island. This may explain how Ben is a school teacher. However, fate is fate, and without Jacob's intervention, it seems that certain paths were meant to cross. Maybe this would help to explain why certain things are different. Like why Hurley is happy or something, and not afraid of the numbers anymore. It does not explain why Locke lived unless it was not Jacob who prevented him from dying. Who knows.
Also of interest this episode- the boy? Was it a young Jacob? Was it someone else? Is he a ghost? Is he a ghost of a formerly dead Jacob? As we know, the Man In Black, has inhabited other bodies once he died as a human. Perhaps this is the age that Jacob first died at, and Jacob later went into another body. Who knows? All we know is that kids can't be born though, and he had on some old ratty looking clothes. My guess is that he is from a former time- but when? His warning to man in black was "You can't kill him." Did he mean, you can't kill Sawyer? As Richard hinted he might? Or did he mean you can't kill Jacob? As in those are the rules? Or as in Jacob can't really die? Many possibilities.
Well Man in Black did not kill Sawyer, but did recruit him. As Richard said he would. Richard also warned that he wanted Sawyer and everyone else dead. He is seemingly playing to Sawyer's desire to get off the island. But as true to his dark nature, it does not seem possible that he is all the way telling the truth. Richard seems very very afraid. Yes Man in Black wants to get off the island, but what does he want to do when he leaves? Does he want to kill many people- is this what Richard is referring to? I do think there is some sort of balance between the Man in Black and Jacob, that has been offset and the Man in Black may be dangerous not only to the island- but to the world at large. He may want the world dead, in some kind of satany apocaylpse kind of way, and hence his need to "recruit."
I do not think it is an accident that Jacob is the name of a ruler. Jacob is a name with significance in the bible, and Jacob was often at odds with others. I was re-reading some Biblical information today and there were some similar themes. Not to say that this about God or anything or the bible, but it may be that there are some recurring historical themes between good and evil.
I really enjoy the alternative reality Hurley and how he is so happy and granting wishes left and right. He seems like an angel. Interesting that Locke was with his girlfriend as they had been broken up before the crash of the light. So some past realities have been resolved. However, Rose still has cancer. Things are messed up, past and present, it's not like everything was fixed from the time of the bomb on...
The more I've given thought to this episode, the cooler it seems.
Anyways, please do discuss amongst yourselves, lots of good food for thought this week....
Things are becoming clearer, aren't they? As we thought previously, Jacob has been selecting people to bring to the island. This is why he touched them. And why the Man in Black knew how people keep ending up on the island. The Man in Black states that Jacob wants them there as replacements. However, it is unknown if everything he states is true. It was cool to see the last names of our castaways behind the famous "numbers." It is also interesting to see how early on Jacob chose some of our castaways.
Which brings me to my new theory. Perhaps the parallel universe we are seeing, sans plane crash is the world that would exist if Jacob had not chosen to bring certain people to the island. This may explain how Ben is a school teacher. However, fate is fate, and without Jacob's intervention, it seems that certain paths were meant to cross. Maybe this would help to explain why certain things are different. Like why Hurley is happy or something, and not afraid of the numbers anymore. It does not explain why Locke lived unless it was not Jacob who prevented him from dying. Who knows.
Also of interest this episode- the boy? Was it a young Jacob? Was it someone else? Is he a ghost? Is he a ghost of a formerly dead Jacob? As we know, the Man In Black, has inhabited other bodies once he died as a human. Perhaps this is the age that Jacob first died at, and Jacob later went into another body. Who knows? All we know is that kids can't be born though, and he had on some old ratty looking clothes. My guess is that he is from a former time- but when? His warning to man in black was "You can't kill him." Did he mean, you can't kill Sawyer? As Richard hinted he might? Or did he mean you can't kill Jacob? As in those are the rules? Or as in Jacob can't really die? Many possibilities.
Well Man in Black did not kill Sawyer, but did recruit him. As Richard said he would. Richard also warned that he wanted Sawyer and everyone else dead. He is seemingly playing to Sawyer's desire to get off the island. But as true to his dark nature, it does not seem possible that he is all the way telling the truth. Richard seems very very afraid. Yes Man in Black wants to get off the island, but what does he want to do when he leaves? Does he want to kill many people- is this what Richard is referring to? I do think there is some sort of balance between the Man in Black and Jacob, that has been offset and the Man in Black may be dangerous not only to the island- but to the world at large. He may want the world dead, in some kind of satany apocaylpse kind of way, and hence his need to "recruit."
I do not think it is an accident that Jacob is the name of a ruler. Jacob is a name with significance in the bible, and Jacob was often at odds with others. I was re-reading some Biblical information today and there were some similar themes. Not to say that this about God or anything or the bible, but it may be that there are some recurring historical themes between good and evil.
I really enjoy the alternative reality Hurley and how he is so happy and granting wishes left and right. He seems like an angel. Interesting that Locke was with his girlfriend as they had been broken up before the crash of the light. So some past realities have been resolved. However, Rose still has cancer. Things are messed up, past and present, it's not like everything was fixed from the time of the bomb on...
The more I've given thought to this episode, the cooler it seems.
Anyways, please do discuss amongst yourselves, lots of good food for thought this week....
Friday, February 12, 2010
Weekly LOST Discussion! Part 2 - by Jess "The Hoss" Tutton
LOST review, Season 6, Episode 2 "What Kate Does"
Sorry this is a little delayed folks, by internet was misbehaving in the Blizzard (the second one) of 2010. Also sorry for all the questions and stream of consciousness. But, this is LOST. It's hard to peg down.
This episode was okay. I wasn't on the edge of my seat or anything. It seems to be one of those episodes that seemingly continues to string us along, leading us into begging for more information. What did we learn? Not too much this time around. Well, we saw that Clare is still alive though the "new Others" say she is "infected." Her new style and ways seem to imply she is Rousseau-ing it up. Also, all this talk of "infection" is very season 1-3. Rousseau said this is what happened to her team. And we do know they died somewhere around the temple as we saw Jin help them last season, in a time travel twist. What is this infection? We don't know. Rousseau didn't die but her crew did, will Sayid die... again? Is this a physical disease or a spiritual disease? When they brought Sayid back to life, they noticed that the water wasn't clear, was that part of the problem? These are the same people who revived Ben. Was something different about Ben's revival? Just some interesting things to think about.... Kate is also very interested in meeting up with Claire. Is Clare dead? Was Rousseau already dead when we saw her? And why do you need to poke someone with hot sticks to figure out if they are infected?
It doesn't appear that Sayid is being inhabited by Jacob. Who knows. When the Man in Black inhabited Locke, he had two bodies, so I guess that kind of makes sense. But, I don't think we've seen the last of Jacob.
In the other plotline, after they get off at LAX, it seems Kate still plays a role in Claire's birthing of Aaron. The adoptive family can not adopt Claire's baby. It seems that even on the other plane of existence, in one way or another, things happened as they did on the island. It does seem that a common theme seems to be that as Daniel had said, things are meant to happen and will happen no matter what. Interesting to see Ethan reemerge in the hospital. Why is he not on the island? It also appears that some of them recognize each other in some way, so it will be interesting to see how that angle plays out. Will the end be the same in both places, stay tuned.
I think a theme of this whole season , and really the whole series- is two different teams. Dark versus light. Good versus bad. Team man in black versus Jacob team. It's confusing to think how Clare and Rousseau fit in, along with our LOST castaways. Who is good and who is bad? Is there a good or a bad, or just a "dilemma"?
We saw Rob McElhenney of "It's Always Sunny" fame reprise his role - briefly- as Aldo. This gave us a general tee hee in our household.
Feel free to post away about things you noticed, or any clever ideas you might have, or any questions. Goodness knows you could write a dissertation on such things. So keep the discussion going!
Sorry this is a little delayed folks, by internet was misbehaving in the Blizzard (the second one) of 2010. Also sorry for all the questions and stream of consciousness. But, this is LOST. It's hard to peg down.
This episode was okay. I wasn't on the edge of my seat or anything. It seems to be one of those episodes that seemingly continues to string us along, leading us into begging for more information. What did we learn? Not too much this time around. Well, we saw that Clare is still alive though the "new Others" say she is "infected." Her new style and ways seem to imply she is Rousseau-ing it up. Also, all this talk of "infection" is very season 1-3. Rousseau said this is what happened to her team. And we do know they died somewhere around the temple as we saw Jin help them last season, in a time travel twist. What is this infection? We don't know. Rousseau didn't die but her crew did, will Sayid die... again? Is this a physical disease or a spiritual disease? When they brought Sayid back to life, they noticed that the water wasn't clear, was that part of the problem? These are the same people who revived Ben. Was something different about Ben's revival? Just some interesting things to think about.... Kate is also very interested in meeting up with Claire. Is Clare dead? Was Rousseau already dead when we saw her? And why do you need to poke someone with hot sticks to figure out if they are infected?
It doesn't appear that Sayid is being inhabited by Jacob. Who knows. When the Man in Black inhabited Locke, he had two bodies, so I guess that kind of makes sense. But, I don't think we've seen the last of Jacob.
In the other plotline, after they get off at LAX, it seems Kate still plays a role in Claire's birthing of Aaron. The adoptive family can not adopt Claire's baby. It seems that even on the other plane of existence, in one way or another, things happened as they did on the island. It does seem that a common theme seems to be that as Daniel had said, things are meant to happen and will happen no matter what. Interesting to see Ethan reemerge in the hospital. Why is he not on the island? It also appears that some of them recognize each other in some way, so it will be interesting to see how that angle plays out. Will the end be the same in both places, stay tuned.
I think a theme of this whole season , and really the whole series- is two different teams. Dark versus light. Good versus bad. Team man in black versus Jacob team. It's confusing to think how Clare and Rousseau fit in, along with our LOST castaways. Who is good and who is bad? Is there a good or a bad, or just a "dilemma"?
We saw Rob McElhenney of "It's Always Sunny" fame reprise his role - briefly- as Aldo. This gave us a general tee hee in our household.
Feel free to post away about things you noticed, or any clever ideas you might have, or any questions. Goodness knows you could write a dissertation on such things. So keep the discussion going!
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



